Kangana was issued a demolition notice by the BMC in 2018 below MRTP Act. Ranaut had challenged the demolition notice in the Dindoshi civil court in January 2019.
She had also requested the court to restrain the civic body from carrying out demolition at her apartment.
The court had then ordered status quo till the hearing of Ranaut’s petition.
Different from Pali Hill bungalow case
On September 9, the BMC had demolished components of Ranaut’s bungalow in the Pali Hill location of suburban Bandra calling them “unauthorised”.
Last month, the higher court, in its order on Ranaut’ petition difficult the BMC’s action, had mentioned it was a “mala fide act” performed to result in substantial loss to the actress.
In her petition, Ranaut had claimed that the BMC had acted out of malice following her tweets against the Mumbai police that had irked the Shiv Sena-led Maharashtra government.
The BMC had denied the allegations and mentioned that the actor had carried out illegal work at the bungalow and its officials had for that reason, acted in accordance with the law in carrying out the demolition work.
The court granted Ranaut permission to make the bungalow habitable in accordance with the sanctioned program and with prior approvals of the civic body.
Ranaut had sought Rs two crore in damages from the BMC.
On the problem of compensation, the bench mentioned it was appointing private firm m/s Shetgiri as the valuer to assess the damages brought on in order to calculate the compensation quantity due to Ranaut.
Ranaut had filed the petition on September 9 when the demolition method was initiated by BMC. The court had in an interim order on September 9 stayed the demolition work.