Facebook has spent $13 billion on user “safety and security” because 2016 with a committed 40,000-sturdy workforce, the US social media giant stated following a week of Wall Street Journal leaks.
The enterprise stated The Wall Street Journal leaks missed critical context about difficult troubles and revealed the numbers to show how it addressed the challenges on Facebook and Instagram.
In a weblog post, Facebook stated: “In the past, we didn’t address safety and security challenges early enough in the product development process.”
“But we have fundamentally changed that approach. Today, we embed teams focusing specifically on safety and security issues directly into product development teams, allowing us to address these issues during our product development process, not after it.”
The Wall Street Journal had alleged that Facebook delayed action in spite of realizing of significant challenges such as Covid-19 misinformation and damaging emotional impact on the platform’s customers. However, it delayed fixing these challenges due to worry of weakening engagement. Facebook executive Nick Clegg has currently issued a rebuttal and accused the newspaper of deliberately mischaracterising what the enterprise was attempting to do.
Facebook’s response recasts the Journal‘s allegations in a positive light — focusing on how it responded not on whether those actions came too late. It highlighted the removal of 20 million false content on Covid-19 and vaccination and the blocking of 3 billion fake accounts just in the first half of 2021.
Facebook’s figures are an update to its earlier numbers. In 2017, the enterprise had 10,000 members of employees, which includes outdoors contractors, working on security and safety and promised to double the figure inside one year.
The $13 billion Facebook has claimed to devote also backs up its 2018 guarantee to devote billions of dollars each and every year on security and safety. Facebook was forced to make higher-profile promises to invest in the location for the duration of 2017 and 2018, when it faced intense scrutiny more than its part in the Cambridge Analytica privacy controversy and election propaganda campaigns.