By Shoubhik Dasgupta and Eishan Agnihotri
The integration of technologies with day-to-day lives of folks has been going on for the much better element of final two decades globally. This has resulted into legislators introducing laws and regulations with an aim to address and regulate any challenges posed by the introduction of technologies which otherwise would have stay unaddressed. While important reforms have been produced by the legislators to successfully regulate sectors such as the e-commerce sector, the on the net gaming and fantasy sports space in India largely stay unregulated. The courts and governmental agencies nevertheless are now attempting to analyse the current legal framework about on the net gaming and introduce the needed alterations if necessary.
While attempting to realize the challenges which are posed by the on the net gaming and fantasy sports platforms in India, it is straightforward to use the two terms interchangeably without having addressing the distinction. The test for a virtual platform (irrespective of whether supplying fantasy sports or games such as rummy, teen patti or poker) remains the game of talent v. game of opportunity test, formulated by the courts in India. To state just, if the outcome for a player in a game is purely dependent upon opportunity without having the application of any actual abilities, the stated game is deemed as a game of opportunity and an act of gambling. While this deduction effortlessly addresses widespread card or board games played in physical spaces, the fantasy sports and virtual space make the scenario a bit far more complicated.
In India, the Public Gambling Act, 1867 (“PGA”) governs and prohibits gaming by men and women in ‘gaming houses’ with a view to derive income out of the act of gaming but the PGA does not cover gaming accomplished by men and women by participating by means of on the net platforms. To counter this, the governments of Sikkim, Nagaland and Telangana have amended their state gaming legislations to cover each traditional gaming homes and virtual gaming spaces.
In a current order passed by the Gujarat High Court on September 29, 2020 in a PIL filed searching for restraint on on the net rummy in the state of Gujarat, the court acknowledged the lack of an acceptable legal framework to prohibit and regulate acts which would otherwise be treated as acts of gambling but couldn’t be as virtual gaming spaces are not covered below the state gaming legislation. Drawing the focus of the government towards the seriousness of the problem, the court cited the amendments produced by the state of Telangana in its state gaming legislation to cover on the net/cyber spaces as nicely. In the order passed by the court, the court directed the government of Gujarat to appear into the problem and take the needed actions. The court also directed the state government to examine irrespective of whether such games outcome in dollars-laundering or violation of laws relating to foreign exchange as nicely.
While far more and far more state governments and judicial bodies are taking a view that on the net card games such as rummy and poker involving true dollars are acts of gambling and acceptable methods need to be taken by the state governments to curb these activities, the identical can not be stated for the fantasy sports segment of virtual gaming. The largest player in the fantasy sport marketplace in India Dream11 has faced the test of becoming a game of talent or a game of opportunity in the previous. The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held in the matter of Varun Gumber v. Union Territory of Chandigarh that the fantasy games presented by Dream11 are games of talent and that Dream11’s enterprise has protection below the Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. This was upheld additional by the Supreme Court of India. In a current order passed on October 16, 2020 in a PIL filed prior to the Rajasthan High Court, the court has once more reiterated that the fantasy games offered by Dream11 are games of mere talent and its enterprise has protection below Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.
While Dream11 has noticed favourable outcomes in the abovementioned situations, all is seemingly not nicely for the fantasy sports provider. On September 25, 2020, the Andhra Pradesh government led by YS Jaganmohan Reddy, passed an ordinance to amend the Andhra Pradesh Gaming Act 1974. This amendment not only imposes a ban on on the net games such as rummy and poker, but also covers fantasy games that involve economic transactions. Following this action by the Andhra Pradesh government, Dream11 amended its registration terms and circumstances to state that:
“In the event a Participant indicates, while entering an address, that he/she is a resident of either Assam, Odisha, Sikkim, Nagaland, Telangana or Andhra Pradesh, such Participant will not be permitted to proceed to sign up for any match in the paid version of the Contest as described below”
With far more and far more folks participating in virtual gaming and fantasy sports and the legislators and courts taking cognizance of the challenges, it is particular that this is just the starting of what will for positive be a full overhaul of the gaming and gambling laws across India.
The report has been authored by Shoubhik Dasgupta, who is a counsel for Pioneer Legal and by Eishan Agnihotri, an associate of Pioneer Legal. This report is meant for informational objective only and does not purport to be suggestions or opinion, legal or otherwise, whatsoever. Views expressed in this Article are private views of the authors.
: How ‘silent’ e-commerce is currently underway in India
Follow us on Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Facebook